Lanthanides or dust in kilonovae: lessons learned from GW170817
Christa Gall, Jens Hjorth, Stephan Rosswog, Nial R. Tanvir, Andrew, J. Levan

TL;DR
This study investigates whether dust formation could explain the near-infrared emission in GW170817's kilonova, concluding that dust is unlikely the main cause based on lightcurve analysis and nucleosynthesis models.
Contribution
The paper tests the dust extinction hypothesis for kilonova emission and finds it inconsistent with observed lightcurves and nucleosynthesis predictions.
Findings
Approximately 10^{-5} solar masses of carbon dust could reproduce lightcurves.
Dust cooling from 2000 K to 1500 K over a week was observed.
Nucleosynthesis models predict at most 10^{-9} solar masses of carbon formation.
Abstract
The unprecedented optical and near-infrared lightcurves of the first electromagnetic counterpart to a gravitational wave source, GW170817, a binary neutron star merger, exhibited a strong evolution from blue to near-infrared (a so-called 'kilonova' or 'macronova'). The emerging near-infrared component is widely attributed to the formation of r-process elements which provide the opacity to shift the blue light into the near infrared. An alternative scenario is that the light from the blue component gets extinguished by dust formed by the kilonova and subsequently is re-emitted at near-infrared wavelengths. We here test this hypothesis using the lightcurves of AT2017gfo, the kilonova accompanying GW170817. We find that of order 10 of carbon is required to reproduce the optical/near-infrared lightcurves as the kilonova fades. This putative dust cools from 2000 K at…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
