Kilonova from post-merger ejecta as an optical and near-infrared counterpart of GW170817
Masaomi Tanaka, Yousuke Utsumi, Paolo A. Mazzali, Nozomu Tominaga,, Michitoshi Yoshida, Yuichiro Sekiguchi, Tomoki Morokuma, Kentaro Motohara,, Kouji Ohta, Koji S. Kawabata, Fumio Abe, Kentaro Aoki, Yuichiro Asakura,, Stefan Baar, Sudhanshu Barway, Ian A. Bond, Mamoru Doi

TL;DR
This study uses radiative transfer simulations to analyze kilonova emissions from GW170817, revealing that post-merger ejecta with specific properties can explain observed optical and near-infrared signals, supporting neutron star mergers as r-process element sources.
Contribution
The paper demonstrates that a medium electron fraction ejecta can simultaneously reproduce optical and near-infrared emissions, highlighting the role of post-merger ejecta in kilonova observations.
Findings
Near-infrared emission explained by 0.03 Msun ejecta with lanthanides.
Optical emission requires ejecta with higher electron fraction (~0.25).
Supports neutron star mergers as sources of r-process elements.
Abstract
Recent detection of gravitational waves from a neutron star (NS) merger event GW170817 and identification of an electromagnetic counterpart provide a unique opportunity to study the physical processes in NS mergers. To derive properties of ejected material from the NS merger, we perform radiative transfer simulations of kilonova, optical and near-infrared emissions powered by radioactive decays of r-process nuclei synthesized in the merger. We find that the observed near-infrared emission lasting for > 10 days is explained by 0.03 Msun of ejecta containing lanthanide elements. However, the blue optical component observed at the initial phases requires an ejecta component with a relatively high electron fraction (Ye). We show that both optical and near-infrared emissions are simultaneously reproduced by the ejecta with a medium Ye of ~ 0.25. We suggest that a dominant component powering…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
