Estimating the Contribution of Dynamical Ejecta in the Kilonova Associated with GW170817
The LIGO Scientific Collaboration, the Virgo Collaboration: B. P., Abbott, R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott, F. Acernese, K. Ackley, C. Adams, T. Adams,, P. Addesso, R. X. Adhikari, V. B. Adya, C. Affeldt, M. Afrough, B. Agarwal,, M. Agathos, K. Agatsuma, N. Aggarwal, O. D. Aguiar

TL;DR
This paper presents a method to estimate the dynamical ejecta mass in kilonovae from gravitational-wave data, enabling assessment of their contribution to galactic r-process element abundance without direct electromagnetic observations.
Contribution
It introduces a phenomenological model calibrated to simulations that estimates ejecta mass from GW data, linking gravitational-wave measurements to kilonova properties and galactic chemical evolution.
Findings
Dynamical ejecta mass ranges between 10^{-3} and 10^{-2} solar masses.
GW170817-like mergers could account for all r-process elements in the Milky Way if >10% of ejecta forms r-process material.
The model enables estimation of ejecta contribution without electromagnetic kilonova observations.
Abstract
The source of the gravitational-wave signal GW170817, very likely a binary neutron star merger, was also observed electromagnetically, providing the first multi-messenger observations of this type. The two week long electromagnetic counterpart had a signature indicative of an r-process-induced optical transient known as a kilonova. This Letter examines how the mass of the dynamical ejecta can be estimated without a direct electromagnetic observation of the kilonova, using gravitational-wave measurements and a phenomenological model calibrated to numerical simulations of mergers with dynamical ejecta. Specifically, we apply the model to the binary masses inferred from the gravitational-wave measurements, and use the resulting mass of the dynamical ejecta to estimate its contribution (without the effects of wind ejecta) to the corresponding kilonova light curves from various models. The…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
