The Electromagnetic Counterpart of the Binary Neutron Star Merger LIGO/VIRGO GW170817. VI. Radio Constraints on a Relativistic Jet and Predictions for Late-Time Emission from the Kilonova Ejecta
K. D. Alexander, E. Berger, W. Fong, P. K. G. Williams, C. Guidorzi,, R. Margutti, B. D. Metzger, J. Annis, P. K. Blanchard, D. Brout, D. A. Brown,, H.-Y. Chen, R. Chornock, P. S. Cowperthwaite, M. Drout, T. Eftekhari, J., Frieman, D. E. Holz, M. Nicholl, A. Rest, M. Sako

TL;DR
This paper reports radio observations of GW170817, constrains jet properties and viewing angles, and predicts long-term radio emission from kilonova ejecta, highlighting the importance of multi-year follow-up for neutron star merger events.
Contribution
It provides the first radio follow-up data post-GW170817, constrains the jet angle and energy, and forecasts detectable late-time emission from kilonova ejecta for future observations.
Findings
Detected faint radio emission at 19 and 39 days post-merger.
Ruled out on-axis short gamma-ray burst for energies >10^48 erg.
Predicted late-time radio emission from kilonova ejecta will be observable for decades.
Abstract
We present Very Large Array (VLA) and Atacama Large Millimeter/sub-millimeter Array ALMA radio observations of GW\,170817, the first Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory (LIGO)/Virgo gravitational wave (GW) event from a binary neutron star merger and the first GW event with an electromagnetic (EM) counterpart. Our data include the first observations following the discovery of the optical transient at both the centimeter ( hours post merger) and millimeter ( days post merger) bands. We detect faint emission at 6 GHz at 19.47 and 39.23 days after the merger, but not in an earlier observation at 2.46 d. We do not detect cm/mm emission at the position of the optical counterpart at frequencies of 10-97.5 GHz at times ranging from 0.6 to 30 days post merger, ruling out an on-axis short gamma-ray burst (SGRB) for energies erg. For fiducial SGRB…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
