The Electromagnetic Counterpart of the Binary Neutron Star Merger LIGO/VIRGO GW170817. VIII. A Comparison to Cosmological Short-duration Gamma-ray Bursts
W. Fong (Hubble Fellow, Northwestern/CIERA), E. Berger, P. K., Blanchard, R. Margutti, P. S. Cowperthwaite, R. Chornock, K. D. Alexander, B., D. Metzger, V. A. Villar, M. Nicholl, T. Eftekhari, P. K. G. Williams, J., Annis, D. Brout, D. A. Brown, H.-Y. Chen, Z. Doctor

TL;DR
This paper compares the electromagnetic counterpart of GW170817 with short gamma-ray bursts, revealing similarities in jet energies and differences mainly due to viewing angles, and discusses implications for kilonovae and host galaxy properties.
Contribution
It provides a detailed comparison of GW170817's electromagnetic signals with short GRBs, highlighting the role of viewing angles and host galaxy characteristics in understanding neutron star mergers.
Findings
GW170817's luminosity is much lower than on-axis short GRBs.
Jet energies and densities are similar, suggesting viewing angle effects dominate.
GW170817's host galaxy is older and less star-forming than typical short GRB hosts.
Abstract
We present a comprehensive comparison of the properties of the radio through X-ray counterpart of GW170817 and the properties of short-duration gamma-ray bursts (GRBs). For this effort, we utilize a sample of 36 short GRBs spanning a redshift range of discovered over 2004-2017. We find that the counterpart to GW170817 has an isotropic-equivalent luminosity that is times less than the median value of on-axis short GRB X-ray afterglows, and times less than that for detected short GRB radio afterglows. Moreover, the allowed jet energies and particle densities inferred from the radio and X-ray counterparts to GW170817 and on-axis short GRB afterglows are remarkably similar, suggesting that viewing angle effects are the dominant, and perhaps only, difference in their observed radio and X-ray behavior. From comparison to previous claimed…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
