$\ell^1$-Analysis Minimization and Generalized (Co-)Sparsity: When Does Recovery Succeed?
Martin Genzel, Gitta Kutyniok, Maximilian M\"arz

TL;DR
This paper provides new theoretical guarantees for $\,\ell^1$-analysis minimization in signal recovery, highlighting the importance of the analysis operator's Gram matrix and coherence, and demonstrating practical effectiveness through numerical experiments.
Contribution
It introduces novel recovery guarantees that depend on the analysis operator's Gram matrix, challenging traditional sparsity paradigms and extending to stable recovery with compressible signals.
Findings
Recovery guarantees depend on the Gram matrix and coherence.
Bounds accurately predict recovery in practical examples.
The framework extends to stable recovery with compressible signals.
Abstract
This paper investigates the problem of signal estimation from undersampled noisy sub-Gaussian measurements under the assumption of a cosparse model. Based on generalized notions of sparsity, we derive novel recovery guarantees for the -analysis basis pursuit, enabling accurate predictions of its sample complexity. The corresponding bounds on the number of required measurements do explicitly depend on the Gram matrix of the analysis operator and therefore particularly account for its mutual coherence structure. Our findings defy conventional wisdom which promotes the sparsity of analysis coefficients as the crucial quantity to study. In fact, this common paradigm breaks down completely in many situations of practical interest, for instance, when applying a redundant (multilevel) frame as analysis prior. By extensive numerical experiments, we demonstrate that, in contrast, our…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
