A search for transit timing variations and orbital decay in WASP-46b

TL;DR

This study analyzes 49 transit light curves of WASP-46b over six years to search for transit timing variations and orbital decay, finding no significant evidence for additional planets or orbital period decrease, and constraining system parameters.

Contribution

First homogeneous TTV analysis of WASP-46b using extensive observational data, setting limits on additional planets and orbital decay.

Findings

No periodic TTVs detected, dispersion of 1.66 minutes.

Ruled out planets larger than 2.3-9.3 Earth masses near resonances.

No significant orbital period decrease observed.

Abstract

We present 12 new transit observations of the exoplanet WASP-46b obtained with the 1.54-m telescope at Estaci\'on Astrof\'isica de Bosque Alegre (EABA, Argentina) and the 0.40-m Horacio Ghielmetti and 2.15-m Jorge Sahade telescopes at Complejo Astron\'omico El Leoncito (CASLEO, Argentina). We analyse them together with 37 light curves from the literature to re-determine the physical parameters and search for additional planets via transit timing variations (TTVs). We consider the 31 transits with uncertainties in their mid-transit times ($e_\mathrm{T_{0}}$) $<$ 1 minute, to perform the first homogeneous study of TTVs for the system, finding a dispersion of $\sigma= 1.66$ minutes over a 6 year baseline. Since no periodic variations are found, our interpretation for this relatively high value of $\sigma$ is that the stellar activity could be affecting the measured mid-transit times. This value of dispersion allows us to rule out the presence of additional bodies with masses larger than 2.3, 4.6, 7, and 9.3 $M_{\mathrm{\bigoplus}}$ at the first-order mean-motion resonances 2:1, 3:2, 4:3, and 5:4 with the transiting planet, respectively. Despite the 6 year baseline and a typical light curve precision of $2 \times 10^{-3}$, we find that we cannot significantly demonstrate a slow decrease of the orbital period of WASP-46b. We place a lower limit of Q$_{\star}$ > $7 \times 10^{3}$ on the tidal quality factor and determine that an additional 6 year baseline is required to rule out Q$_{\star}$ < $10^{5}$.