Cohomologies on almost complex manifolds and the $\partial \bar{\partial}$-lemma
Ki Fung Chan, Spiro Karigiannis, Chi Cheuk Tsang

TL;DR
This paper explores cohomologies on almost complex manifolds, introducing new tools to distinguish non-integrable structures and extend classical lemmas like the $ar{ ext{d}}$-lemma to non-integrable cases.
Contribution
It defines and studies the $N$-cohomology and $J$-cohomology, extending their applicability to non-integrable almost complex structures and relating them to the $ ext{d} ext{L}_J$-lemma.
Findings
$H^{ullet}_N (M)$ distinguishes non-isomorphic non-integrable structures.
$H^{ullet}_J (M)$ encodes the $ar{ ext{d}}$-lemma and its non-integrable analogue.
Finite-dimensionality of $H^k_J$ shown for compact integrable cases, with partial results for non-integrable cases.
Abstract
We study cohomologies on an almost complex manifold , defined using the Nijenhuis-Lie derivations and induced from the almost complex structure and its Nijenhuis tensor , regarded as vector-valued forms on . We show how one of these, the -cohomology , can be used to distinguish non-isomorphic non-integrable almost complex structures on . Another one, the -cohomology , is familiar in the integrable case but we extend its definition and applicability to the case of non-integrable almost complex structures. The -cohomology encodes whether a complex manifold satisfies the -lemma, and more generally in the non-integrable case the -cohomology encodes whether satisfies the -lemma, which we introduce and motivate in this paper. We…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
