Fermi non-detections of four X-ray jet sources and implications for the IC/CMB mechanism
Peter Breiding, Eileen T. Meyer, Markos Georganopoulos, M. E. Keenan,, N. S. DeNigris, and Jennifer Hewitt

TL;DR
This study uses Fermi, HST, and ALMA observations to test the IC/CMB model for X-ray jets in quasars, finding that the model's predictions are inconsistent with observed gamma-ray and optical data, challenging its validity.
Contribution
The paper provides new gamma-ray upper limits for four quasar jets and demonstrates these limits contradict the IC/CMB emission model, offering strong evidence against it.
Findings
Fermi gamma-ray upper limits violate IC/CMB predictions
HST detects optical jet in PKS 2209+080
ALMA data constrains spectral shape, ruling out IC/CMB
Abstract
Since its launch in 1999, the Chandra X-ray observatory has discovered several dozen X-ray jets associated with powerful quasars. In many cases the X-ray spectrum is hard and appears to come from a second spectral component. The most popular explanation for the kpc-scale X-ray emission in these cases has been inverse-Compton (IC) scattering of Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) photons by relativistic electrons in the jet (the IC/CMB model). Requiring the IC/CMB emission to reproduce the observed X-ray flux density inevitably predicts a high level of gamma-ray emission which should be detectable with the Fermi Large Area Telescope (LAT). In previous work, we found that gamma-ray upper limits from the large scale jets of 3C 273 and PKS 0637-752 violate the predictions of the IC/CMB model. Here we present Fermi/LAT flux density upper limits for the X-ray jets of four additional sources:…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
