Counterfactual Conditionals in Quantified Modal Logic
Naveen Sundar Govindarajulu, Selmer Bringsjord

TL;DR
This paper introduces a new formal system for counterfactual conditionals within quantified modal logic, enhancing moral reasoning models and demonstrating practical applications and computational feasibility.
Contribution
It provides the first fully specified and implemented formalization of counterfactuals in QML for moral reasoning, including validation through complex moral principles and dataset creation.
Findings
Model can represent the doctrine of double effect
System can generate true and false counterfactuals
Approach is computationally feasible
Abstract
We present a novel formalization of counterfactual conditionals in a quantified modal logic. Counterfactual conditionals play a vital role in ethical and moral reasoning. Prior work has shown that moral reasoning systems (and more generally, theory-of-mind reasoning systems) should be at least as expressive as first-order (quantified) modal logic (QML) to be well-behaved. While existing work on moral reasoning has focused on counterfactual-free QML moral reasoning, we present a fully specified and implemented formal system that includes counterfactual conditionals. We validate our model with two projects. In the first project, we demonstrate that our system can be used to model a complex moral principle, the doctrine of double effect. In the second project, we use the system to build a data-set with true and false counterfactuals as licensed by our theory, which we believe can be useful…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPsychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment · Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation · Ethics in Business and Education
