On the incidence of MgII absorbers along the blazar sightlines
S. Mishra (1), H. Chand (2), Gopal-Krishna (2), R. Joshi (3,4), Y. A., Shchekinov (5,6), T. A. Fatkhullin (7) ((1) Aryabhatta Research Institute of, Observational Sciences (ARIES), India (2) UM-DAE Centre for Excellence in, Basic Sciences, University of Mumbai

TL;DR
This study revisits the incidence of MgII absorbers along blazar sightlines, finding that their number density is consistent with normal quasars when larger samples and independent analysis are used, challenging previous claims of excess.
Contribution
The paper provides an independent analysis with a larger blazar sample, showing that MgII absorber incidence along blazars matches that of normal quasars, countering earlier reports of excess.
Findings
MgII absorber incidence along blazars matches normal QSOs.
Previous excess claims are confirmed only in smaller samples.
Associated absorbers may contribute up to 0.2c velocity offsets.
Abstract
It is widely believed that the cool gas clouds traced by MgII absorption, within a velocity offset of 5000 km/s relative to the background quasar are mostly associated with the quasar itself, whereas the absorbers seen at larger velocity offsets towards us are intervening absorber systems and hence their existence is completely independent of the background quasar. Recent evidence by Bergeron et al. (2011, hereinafter BBM) has seriously questioned this paradigm, by showing that the number density of intervening MgII absorbers towards the 45 blazars in their sample is nearly 2 times the expectation based on the MgII absorption systems seen towards normal QSOs. Given its serious implications, it becomes important to revisit this finding, by enlarging the blazar sample and subjecting it to an independent analysis. Here, we first report the outcome of our re-analysis of the available…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
