Science and its significant other: Representing the humanities in bibliometric scholarship
Thomas Franssen, Paul Wouters

TL;DR
This paper reviews how bibliometrics has historically represented the humanities, highlighting the performative nature of bibliometric analysis and its influence on the science system, especially in science policy and evaluation.
Contribution
It provides a historical analysis of the representation of humanities in bibliometric scholarship from 1965 to 2016, emphasizing the shift from sociological frameworks to policy-oriented approaches.
Findings
Two distinct periods of bibliometric scholarship identified
Shift from sociological to policy-oriented frameworks
Bibliometric methods influence science system and evaluation
Abstract
Bibliometrics offers a particular representation of science. Through bibliometric methods a bibliometrician will always highlight particular elements of publications, and through these elements operationalize particular representations of science, while obscuring other possible representations from view. Understanding bibliometrics as representation implies that a bibliometric analysis is always performative: a bibliometric analysis brings a particular representation of science into being that potentially influences the science system itself. In this review we analyze the ways the humanities have been represented throughout the history of bibliometrics, often in comparison to other scientific domains or to a general notion of the sciences. Our review discusses bibliometric scholarship between 1965 and 2016 that studies the humanities empirically. We distinguish between two periods of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
