Bayesian Propensity Scores for High-Dimensional Causal Inference: A Comparison of Drug-Eluting to Bare-Metal Coronary Stents
Jacob Spertus, Sharon-Lise Normand

TL;DR
This paper introduces Bayesian propensity score methods tailored for high-dimensional causal inference, demonstrating their effectiveness through simulations and real-world cardiac stent data analysis with numerous confounders.
Contribution
It presents a novel simple estimator for average treatment effects leveraging conjugacy, and evaluates Bayesian methods like horseshoe priors and BART in high-dimensional settings.
Findings
Bayesian methods outperform frequentist approaches in high-dimensional data.
The new estimator effectively captures treatment effect uncertainty.
Including variance from treatment and outcome models improves estimates.
Abstract
High-dimensional data can be useful for causal inference by providing many confounders that may bolster the plausibility of the ignorability assumption. Propensity score methods are powerful tools for causal inference, are popular in health care research, and are particularly useful for high-dimensional data. Recent interest has surrounded a Bayesian formulation of these methods in order to flexibly estimate propensity scores and summarize posterior quantities while incorporating variance from the (potentially high-dimensional) treatment model. We discuss methods for Bayesian propensity score analysis of binary treatments, focusing on modern methods for high-dimensional Bayesian regression and the propagation of uncertainty from the treatment regression. We introduce a novel and simple estimator for the average treatment effect that capitalizes on conjugancy of the beta and binomial…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
