Stone-Type Dualities for Separation Logics
Simon Docherty, David Pym

TL;DR
This paper develops a unified Stone-type duality framework for various bunched logics, including Separation Logic and its extensions, providing new soundness and completeness results and connecting resource semantics with categorical and modal logic techniques.
Contribution
It systematically extends Stone duality to a broad class of bunched logics, including new variants like Concurrent Kleene BI, unifying semantic and algebraic perspectives.
Findings
Established duality theorems for multiple bunched logics.
Proved soundness and completeness for several complex models.
Unified resource semantics with modal and categorical logic techniques.
Abstract
Stone-type duality theorems, which relate algebraic and relational/topological models, are important tools in logic because -- in addition to elegant abstraction -- they strengthen soundness and completeness to a categorical equivalence, yielding a framework through which both algebraic and topological methods can be brought to bear on a logic. We give a systematic treatment of Stone-type duality for the structures that interpret bunched logics, starting with the weakest systems, recovering the familiar BI and Boolean BI (BBI), and extending to both classical and intuitionistic Separation Logic. We demonstrate the uniformity and modularity of this analysis by additionally capturing the bunched logics obtained by extending BI and BBI with modalities and multiplicative connectives corresponding to disjunction, negation and falsum. This includes the logic of separating modalities (LSM), De…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
