Simulating Organogenesis in COMSOL: Comparison Of Methods For Simulating Branching Morphogenesis
Lucas D. Wittwer, Michael Peters, Sebastian Aland, Dagmar Iber

TL;DR
This paper compares two computational methods, ALE and Phase-Field, for simulating lung branching morphogenesis, highlighting the advantages of the Phase-Field approach in handling complex tissue growth.
Contribution
It introduces a Phase-Field implementation for simulating organogenesis and provides a detailed comparison with the traditional ALE method.
Findings
Phase-Field method avoids mesh deformation issues.
Phase-Field allows for more complex and extended simulations.
Comparison shows advantages of Phase-Field over ALE in lung development modeling.
Abstract
During organogenesis tissue grows and deforms. The growth processes are controlled by diffusible proteins, so-called morphogens. Many different patterning mechanisms have been proposed. The stereotypic branching program during lung development can be recapitulated by a receptor-ligand based Turing model. Our group has previously used the Arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian (ALE) framework for solving the receptor-ligand Turing model on growing lung domains. However, complex mesh deformations which occur during lung growth severely limit the number of branch generations that can be simulated. A new Phase-Field implementation avoids mesh deformations by considering the surface of the modelling domains as interfaces between phases, and by coupling the reaction-diffusion framework to these surfaces. In this paper, we present a rigorous comparison between the Phase-Field approach and the ALE-based…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsModular Robots and Swarm Intelligence
