
TL;DR
This paper introduces skew trusses, a generalization of braces and rings, exploring their algebraic structure, morphisms, and linearizations into Hopf trusses, revealing new insights into their properties and relationships.
Contribution
It proposes the concept of skew trusses, linking group and semigroup operations via a cocycle, and extends to Hopf trusses, enriching the algebraic framework of braces.
Findings
Skew trusses interpolate between rings and braces.
A cocycle characterizes the transition from truss to brace.
Hopf trusses generalize the set-theoretic structures.
Abstract
In an attempt to understand the origins and the nature of the law binding together two group operations into a {\em skew brace}, introduced in [L.\ Guarnieri \& L.\ Vendramin, Math.\ Comp.\ \textbf{86} (2017), 2519--2534] as a non-Abelian version of the {\em brace distributive law} of [W.\ Rump, J.\ Algebra {\bf 307} (2007), 153--170] and [F.\ Ced\'o, E.\ Jespers \& J.\ Okni\'nski, Commun.\ Math.\ Phys.\ {\bf 327} (2014), 101--116], the notion of a {\em skew truss} is proposed. A skew truss consists of a set with a group operation and a semigroup operation connected by a modified distributive law that interpolates between that of a ring and a brace. It is shown that a particular action and a cocycle characteristic of skew braces are already present in a skew truss; in fact the interpolating function is a 1-cocycle, the bijecitivity of which indicates the existence of an operation that…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
