Ranking and Selection with Covariates for Personalized Decision Making
Haihui Shen, L. Jeff Hong, Xiaowei Zhang

TL;DR
This paper develops a statistical framework for personalized ranking and selection using covariates, enabling tailored decisions with guarantees, validated through simulations and a medical case study.
Contribution
It introduces a linear model-based R&S-C method with two-stage procedures for different error variances, extending the slippage configuration and demonstrating practical benefits.
Findings
Procedures achieve statistical validity for correct selection.
Numerical experiments show robustness and performance.
Case study indicates improved personalized treatment outcomes.
Abstract
We consider a problem of ranking and selection via simulation in the context of personalized decision making, where the best alternative is not universal but varies as a function of some observable covariates. The goal of ranking and selection with covariates (R&S-C) is to use simulation samples to obtain a selection policy that specifies the best alternative with certain statistical guarantee for subsequent individuals upon observing their covariates. A linear model is proposed to capture the relationship between the mean performance of an alternative and the covariates. Under the indifference-zone formulation, we develop two-stage procedures for both homoscedastic and heteroscedastic simulation errors, respectively, and prove their statistical validity in terms of average probability of correct selection. We also generalize the well-known slippage configuration, and prove that the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
