Capacity of a Full-Duplex Wirelessly Powered Communication System with Self-Interference and Processing Cost
Ivana Nikoloska, Nikola Zlatanov, and Zoran Hadzi-Velkov

TL;DR
This paper derives the capacity of a full-duplex wirelessly powered communication system with self-interference, highlighting the impact of self-interference and processing costs on achievable data rates and proposing a simple capacity-achieving scheme.
Contribution
It provides the first capacity analysis of a full-duplex wirelessly powered system considering self-interference and processing costs, with a practical, simple scheme for resource-limited devices.
Findings
Significant data rate improvements with the capacity-achieving scheme over half-duplex.
Self-interference benefits energy harvesting but impairs decoding at the ET.
Processing costs critically reduce achievable rates if not properly accounted for.
Abstract
In this paper, we investigate the capacity of a point-to-point, full-duplex (FD), wirelessly powered communication system impaired by self-interference. This system is comprised of an energy transmitter (ET) and an energy harvesting user (EHU), both operating in a FD mode. The ET transmits energy towards the EHU. The EHU harvests this energy and uses it to transmit information back to the ET. As a result of the FD mode, both nodes are affected by self-interference. The self-interference has a different effect at the two nodes: it impairs the decoding of the received signal at the ET, however, it provides an additional source of energy for the EHU. This paper derives the capacity of this communication system assuming a processing cost at the EHU and additive white Gaussian noise channel with block fading. Thereby, we show that the capacity achieving scheme is relatively simple and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
