Black Hole Spectroscopy: Systematic Errors and Ringdown Energy Estimates
Vishal Baibhav, Emanuele Berti, Vitor Cardoso, Gaurav Khanna

TL;DR
This paper investigates the systematic errors in black hole ringdown modeling, emphasizing the importance of including multiple quasinormal modes for accurate parameter estimation and energy measurement in gravitational wave signals.
Contribution
It provides a systematic analysis of the number of quasinormal modes needed for precise black hole parameter estimation and improves estimates of ringdown energy radiated in multipoles.
Findings
At least the first overtone is needed for 1% accuracy in fundamental mode.
Two quasinormal modes are required for 1% precision in mass and spin estimation.
Improved estimates of ringdown energy radiated in multipoles.
Abstract
The relaxation of a distorted black hole to its final state provides important tests of general relativity within the reach of current and upcoming gravitational wave facilities. In black hole perturbation theory, this phase consists of a simple linear superposition of exponentially damped sinusoids (the quasinormal modes) and of a power-law tail. How many quasinormal modes are necessary to describe waveforms with a prescribed precision? What error do we incur by only including quasinormal modes, and not tails? What other systematic effects are present in current state-of-the-art numerical waveforms? These issues, which are basic to testing fundamental physics with distorted black holes, have hardly been addressed in the literature. We use numerical relativity waveforms and accurate evolutions within black hole perturbation theory to provide some answers. We show that (i) a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
