An Empirical Study of Contamination in Deep, Rapid, and Wide-Field Optical Follow-Up of Gravitational Wave Events
P. S. Cowperthwaite, E. Berger, A. Rest, R. Chornock, D. M. Scolnic,, P. K. G. Williams, W. Fong, M. R. Drout, R. J. Foley, R. Margutti, R. Lunnan,, B. D. Metzger, and E. Quataert

TL;DR
This study empirically evaluates contamination rates in optical follow-up searches of gravitational wave events, providing insights into false positives and efficiencies for identifying kilonova counterparts.
Contribution
It offers the first detailed empirical analysis of contamination rates and detection efficiencies in deep, rapid, wide-field optical follow-up of GW sources.
Findings
Identified 11 red and 10 blue kilonova-like contaminants.
Achieved 90% efficiency for red and 60% for blue kilonova-like sources.
Estimated contamination sky rates of 0.16, 0.80, and 1.79 deg$^{-2}$ for red, blue, and total sources.
Abstract
We present an empirical study of contamination in deep, rapid, and wide-field optical follow-up searches of GW sources from aLIGO. We utilize dedicated observations during four nights of imaging with DECam. Our search covered deg, with two visits per night separated by ~hours, in - and -band, followed by an additional set of images three weeks later to serve as reference images for subtraction, and for the purpose of identifying galaxy and stellar counterparts for any transient sources. We achieve point-source limiting magnitudes of and mag in the coadded single-epoch images. We conduct a search for transient objects that can mimic the color behavior of both red (~mag) and blue (~mag) kilonova emission, finding 11 and 10 contaminants, respectively. Independent of color, we identify…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
