Absence of confinement in (SrTiO3)/(SrTi0:8Nb0:2O3) superlattices
G. Bouzerar, S. Th\'ebaud, R. Bouzerar, S. Pailh\`es, and Ch. Adessi

TL;DR
This study investigates (SrTiO3)/(SrTi0.8Nb0.2O3) superlattices and finds that the expected quantum confinement of carriers is not present, with electrons remaining delocalized, challenging previous assumptions about their thermoelectric properties.
Contribution
The paper provides a detailed analysis showing that electrons in these superlattices are delocalized, contradicting the common confinement-based explanation for their high Seebeck coefficients.
Findings
Electrons are delocalized in both in-plane and growth directions.
Quantum confinement is unlikely in these superlattices.
High Seebeck coefficients are not due to confinement.
Abstract
The reduction of dimensionality is an efficient pathway to boost the performances of thermoelectric materials, it leads to the quantum confinement of the carriers and thus to large Seebeck coefficients (S) and it also suppresses the thermal conductivity by increasing the phonon scattering processes. However, quantum confinement in superlattices is not always easy to achieve and needs to be carefully validated. In the past decade, large values of S have been measured in (SrTiO3)/(SrTi0:8Nb0:2O3) superlattices (Nat. Mater. 6, 129 (2007) and Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 192105 (2007)). In the -doped compound, the measured S was almost 6 times larger than that of the bulk material. This huge increase has been attributed to the two dimensional confinement of the carriers in the doped regions. In this work, we demonstrate that the experimental data can be well explained quantitatively within…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
