On Kelly Betting: Some Limitations
Chung-Han Hsieh, B. Ross Barmish

TL;DR
This paper critically examines the limitations of the Kelly Criterion, highlighting issues with approximations and drawdowns, and suggests future research directions for improving the theory.
Contribution
It provides specific examples of the Kelly Criterion's limitations, especially regarding Taylor approximations and wealth drawdowns, and proposes research directions for enhancement.
Findings
Illustrates difficulties with Taylor-style approximations
Quantifies issues related to wealth drawdowns
Suggests promising research directions for theory improvement
Abstract
The focal point of this paper is the so-called Kelly Criterion, a prescription for optimal resource allocation among a set of gambles which are repeated over time. The criterion calls for maximization of the expected value of the logarithmic growth of wealth. While significant literature exists providing the rationale for such an optimization, this paper concentrates on the limitations of the Kelly-based theory. To this end, we fill a void in published results by providing specific examples quantifying what difficulties are encountered when Taylor-style approximations are used and when wealth drawdowns are considered. For the case of drawdown, we describe some research directions which we feel are promising for improvement of the theory.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsConsumer Market Behavior and Pricing · Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
