Pitfalls of iterative pole mass calculation in electroweak multiplets

TL;DR

This paper demonstrates that an iterative method for calculating electroweak multiplet mass splittings introduces large uncertainties and scale dependence, recommending a non-iterative approach for more reliable results in phenomenological studies.

Contribution

The study reveals significant pitfalls of the iterative pole mass calculation method, advocating for a non-iterative approach to improve accuracy in electroweak multiplet mass splitting computations.

Findings

Iterative method causes large scale and gauge dependence.

Non-iterative method reduces uncertainties in mass splitting.

Higher-order corrections do not fix iterative method issues.

Abstract

The radiatively-induced mass splitting between components of an electroweak multiplet is typically of order 100 MeV. This is sufficient to endow the charged components with macroscopically-observable lifetimes, and ensure an electrically-neutral dark matter particle. We show that a commonly used iterative procedure to compute radiatively-corrected pole masses can lead to very different mass splittings than a non-iterative calculation at the same loop order. By estimating the uncertainties of the two one-loop results, we show that the iterative procedure is significantly more sensitive to the choice of renormalisation scale and gauge parameter than the non-iterative method. This can cause the lifetime of the charged component to vary by up to 12 orders of magnitude if iteration is employed. We show that individual pole masses exhibit similar scale-dependence regardless of the procedure, but that the leading scale-dependent terms cancel when computing the mass splitting if and only if the non-iterative procedure is employed. We show that this behaviour persists at two-loop order: the precision of the mass splitting improves in the non-iterative approach, but our results suggest that higher-order corrections do not reduce the uncertainty in the iterative calculation enough to resolve the problem at two-loop order. We conclude that the iterative procedure should not be used for computing pole masses in situations where electroweak mass splittings are phenomenologically relevant.