Validating Computer Security Methods: Meta-methodology for an Adversarial Science
Antonio Roque

TL;DR
This paper develops a meta-methodology and taxonomy to validate computer security methods, addressing the unique challenges posed by adversarial interactions and interdisciplinary foundations in the field.
Contribution
It introduces a taxonomy of properties and methods, along with a decision tree for adversarial interactions, to systematically validate security techniques.
Findings
A comprehensive taxonomy of validation properties
A decision tree for characterizing adversarial interactions
Framework for addressing invalidation in security methods
Abstract
How can we justify the validity of our computer security methods? This meta-methodological question is related to recent explorations on the science of computer security, which have been hindered by computer security's unique properties. We confront this by developing a taxonomy of properties and methods. Interdisciplinary foundations provide a solid grounding for a set of essential concepts, including a decision tree for characterizing adversarial interaction. Several types of invalidation and general ways of addressing them are described for technical methods. An interdisciplinary argument from theory explains the role that meta-methodological validation plays in the adversarial science of computer security.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Malware Detection Techniques · Information and Cyber Security · Physical Unclonable Functions (PUFs) and Hardware Security
