A Coin-Tossing Conundrum
James Stein, Leonard M. Wapner

TL;DR
This paper explores how an equiprobability hypothesis could allow predicting a fair coin toss with over 50% success, challenging traditional probability assumptions and examining its implications and possible implementations.
Contribution
It introduces a novel equiprobability hypothesis that questions standard probability theory and discusses its potential independence and practical applications.
Findings
Possible prediction success rate exceeds 50%
Discussion on independence from traditional probability hypotheses
Proposals for implementing or circumventing the hypothesis
Abstract
It is shown that an equiprobability hypothesis leads to a scenario in which it is possible to predict the outcome of a single toss of a fair coin with a success probability greater than 50%. We discuss whether this hypothesis might be independent of the usual hypotheses governing probability, as well as whether this hypothesis might be assumed as a result of the Principle of Indifference. Also discussed are ways to implement or circumvent the hypothesis.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLaw, Economics, and Judicial Systems · Probability and Statistical Research · Legal and Constitutional Studies
