Measuring Dark Energy Properties with Photometrically Classified Pan-STARRS Supernovae. II. Cosmological Parameters
D. O. Jones, D. M. Scolnic, A. G. Riess, A. Rest, R. P. Kirshner, E., Berger, R. Kessler, Y.-C. Pan, R. J. Foley, R. Chornock, C. A. Ortega, P. J., Challis, W. S. Burgett, K. C. Chambers, P. W. Draper, H. Flewelling, M. E., Huber, N. Kaiser, R.-P. Kudritzki, N. Metcalfe

TL;DR
This study uses a large sample of photometrically classified supernovae from Pan-STARRS, combined with CMB data, to measure cosmological parameters, especially the dark energy equation of state, demonstrating the viability of photometric classification for cosmology.
Contribution
It introduces a Bayesian methodology to infer cosmological parameters from photometrically classified SNe, effectively marginalizing over core-collapse contamination, and provides one of the tightest constraints on the dark energy parameter w.
Findings
Measured w = -0.989 ± 0.057, consistent with a cosmological constant.
Found minimal systematic bias from classification priors and contamination modeling.
Demonstrated that photometric SN samples with ~5% contamination yield competitive cosmological constraints.
Abstract
We use 1169 Pan-STARRS supernovae (SNe) and 195 low- () SNe Ia to measure cosmological parameters. Though most Pan-STARRS SNe lack spectroscopic classifications, in a previous paper (I) we demonstrated that photometrically classified SNe can be used to infer unbiased cosmological parameters by using a Bayesian methodology that marginalizes over core-collapse (CC) SN contamination. Our sample contains nearly twice as many SNe as the largest previous SN Ia compilation. Combining SNe with Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) constraints from Planck, we measure the dark energy equation of state parameter to be -0.9890.057 (statsys). If evolves with redshift as , we find and -0.5130.826. These results are consistent with cosmological parameters from the Joint Lightcurve Analysis and the Pantheon sample. We…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
