Type Ia Supernova Distances at z > 1.5 from the Hubble Space Telescope Multi-Cycle Treasury Programs: The Early Expansion Rate
Adam G. Riess, Steven A. Rodney, Daniel M. Scolnic, Daniel L. Shafer,, Louis-Gregory Strolger, Henry C. Ferguson, Marc Postman, Or Graur, Dan Maoz,, Saurabh W. Jha, Bahram Mobasher, Stefano Casertano, Brian Hayden, Alberto, Molino, Jens Hjorth, Peter M. Garnavich, David O. Jones

TL;DR
This study analyzes high-redshift Type Ia supernovae from Hubble observations to improve measurements of the universe's expansion rate and constrain dark energy models, achieving significant precision gains at z > 1.5.
Contribution
It provides new high-redshift SN Ia data, enhances the accuracy of expansion rate measurements at z > 1.5, and demonstrates the effectiveness of these measurements in constraining dark energy.
Findings
Improved the uncertainty of H(z=1.5) to ~20%.
Demonstrated that six key measurements suffice for dark energy characterization.
Forecasted future constraints from WFIRST SN survey.
Abstract
We present an analysis of 15 Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) at redshift z > 1 (9 at 1.5 < z < 2.3) recently discovered in the CANDELS and CLASH Multi-Cycle Treasury programs using WFC3 on the Hubble Space Telescope. We combine these SNe Ia with a new compilation of 1050 SNe Ia, jointly calibrated and corrected for simulated survey biases to produce accurate distance measurements. We present unbiased constraints on the expansion rate at six redshifts in the range 0.07 < z < 1.5 based only on this combined SN Ia sample. The added leverage of our new sample at z > 1.5 leads to a factor of ~3 improvement in the determination of the expansion rate at z = 1.5, reducing its uncertainty to ~20%, a measurement of H(z=1.5)/H0=2.67 (+0.83,-0.52). We then demonstrate that these six measurements alone provide a nearly identical characterization of dark energy as the full SN sample, making them an…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
