Empirical Modeling of the Redshift Evolution of the [NII]/H$\alpha$-ratio for Galaxy Redshift Surveys
Andreas L. Faisst, Daniel Masters, Yun Wang, Alexander Merson, Peter, Capak, Sangeeta Malhotra, James E. Rhoads

TL;DR
This paper provides an empirical model for the [NII]/Hα flux ratio evolution with redshift and stellar mass, improving the accuracy of galaxy emission line measurements and forecasts for future surveys like Euclid and WFIRST.
Contribution
It introduces a new empirical parameterization of the [NII]/Hα ratio as a function of stellar mass and redshift, enhancing modeling and deblending in galaxy surveys.
Findings
Large variation in [NII]/Hα ratio at fixed redshift due to stellar mass dependence.
Constant contamination assumptions can significantly overestimate Hα luminosities.
Impacts on predictions of Hα emitters for Euclid and WFIRST.
Abstract
We present an empirical parameterization of the [NII]/H flux ratio as a function of stellar mass and redshift valid at 0 < z < 2.7 and 8.5 < log(M) < 11.0. This description can easily be applied to (i) simulations for modeling [NII] line emission, (ii) deblend [NII] and H in current low-resolution grism and narrow-band observations to derive intrinsic H fluxes, and (iii) to reliably forecast the number counts of H emission-line galaxies for future surveys, such as those planned for Euclid and the Wide Field Infrared Survey Telescope (WFIRST). Our model combines the evolution of the locus on the Baldwin, Phillips & Terlevich (BPT) diagram measured in spectroscopic data out to z = 2.5 with the strong dependence of [NII]/H on stellar mass and [OIII]/H observed in local galaxy samples. We find large variations in the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
