Galaxy Zoo: Secular evolution of barred galaxies from structural decomposition of multi-band images
Sandor J. Kruk, Chris J. Lintott, Steven P. Bamford, Karen L. Masters,, Brooke D. Simmons, Boris H\"au{\ss}ler, Carolin N. Cardamone, Ross E. Hart,, Lee Kelvin, Kevin Schawinski, Rebecca J. Smethurst, Marina Vika

TL;DR
This study uses multi-band photometric decompositions of over 3,500 barred galaxies from SDSS to analyze their structural components, revealing differences in colors and potential evidence of secular evolution driven by bars.
Contribution
It provides the largest photometric decomposition analysis of barred galaxies including a bar component, linking bar presence to galaxy evolution and pseudobulge formation.
Findings
Discs in unbarred galaxies are bluer than in barred galaxies.
Most bulges have Sersic indices indicating pseudobulges.
Barred galaxies show signs of secular evolution affecting their structure.
Abstract
We present the results of two-component (disc+bar) and three-component (disc+bar+bulge) multiwavelength 2D photometric decompositions of barred galaxies in five SDSS bands (). This sample of 3,500 nearby () galaxies with strong bars selected from the Galaxy Zoo citizen science project is the largest sample of barred galaxies to be studied using photometric decompositions which include a bar component. With detailed structural analysis we obtain physical quantities such as the bar- and bulge-to-total luminosity ratios, effective radii, S\'ersic indices and colours of the individual components. We observe a clear difference in the colours of the components, the discs being bluer than the bars and bulges. An overwhelming fraction of bulge components have S\'ersic indices consistent with being pseudobulges. By comparing the barred galaxies with a mass-matched and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
