Simulating galaxies in the reionization era with FIRE-2: morphologies and sizes
Xiangcheng Ma (Caltech), Philip F. Hopkins (Caltech), Michael, Boylan-Kolchin (UT Austin), Claude-Andr\'e Faucher-Gigu\`ere (Northwestern),, Eliot Quataert (Berkeley), Robert Feldmann (U of Zurich), Shea, Garrison-Kimmel (Caltech), Christopher C. Hayward (Flatiron), Du\v{s}an

TL;DR
This study uses high-resolution simulations to analyze the morphologies and sizes of galaxies during the reionization era, revealing how observed sizes depend on wavelength, brightness limits, and galaxy mass.
Contribution
It provides new insights into galaxy sizes, morphologies, and their evolution at z>5 using detailed cosmological simulations, including predictions for observational surface brightness profiles.
Findings
Galaxy sizes increase with stellar mass and luminosity but with large scatter.
UV morphologies are dominated by bright stellar clumps not always linked to stellar mass.
Galaxy size evolution follows a (1+z)^{-m} trend with m~1-2.
Abstract
We study the morphologies and sizes of galaxies at z>5 using high-resolution cosmological zoom-in simulations from the Feedback In Realistic Environments project. The galaxies show a variety of morphologies, from compact to clumpy to irregular. The simulated galaxies have more extended morphologies and larger sizes when measured using rest-frame optical B-band light than rest-frame UV light; sizes measured from stellar mass surface density are even larger. The UV morphologies are usually dominated by several small, bright young stellar clumps that are not always associated with significant stellar mass. The B-band light traces stellar mass better than the UV, but it can also be biased by the bright clumps. At all redshifts, galaxy size correlates with stellar mass/luminosity with large scatter. The half-light radii range from 0.01 to 0.2 arcsec (0.05-1 kpc physical) at fixed magnitude.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
