Adaptive Generation-Based Evolution Control for Gaussian Process Surrogate Models
Jakub Repicky, Lukas Bajer, Zbynek Pitra, Martin Holena

TL;DR
This paper introduces an adaptive method to improve surrogate-assisted Covariance Matrix Adaptation Evolution Strategy (CMA-ES) by dynamically adjusting the number of generations using Gaussian process models, leading to minor performance gains.
Contribution
It proposes an adaptive procedure for surrogate model usage in S-CMA-ES, enhancing the existing fixed-lifetime approach with performance-based adjustments.
Findings
Minor improvement with larger surrogate lifelengths
Performance varies depending on the surrogate measure used
Adaptive approach slightly outperforms fixed strategies
Abstract
The interest in accelerating black-box optimizers has resulted in several surrogate model-assisted version of the Covariance Matrix Adaptation Evolution Strategy, a state-of-the-art continuous black-box optimizer. The version called Surrogate CMA-ES uses Gaussian processes or random forests surrogate models with a generation-based evolution control. This paper presents an adaptive improvement for S-CMA-ES based on a general procedure introduced with the s*ACM-ES algorithm, in which the number of generations using the surrogate model before retraining is adjusted depending on the performance of the last instance of the surrogate. Three algorithms that differ in the measure of the surrogate model's performance are evaluated on the COCO/BBOB framework. The results show a minor improvement on S-CMA-ES with constant model lifelengths, especially when larger lifelengths are considered.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms · Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms Research · Optimal Experimental Design Methods
