Comparison of PCA with ICA from data distribution perspective
Miron Ivanov

TL;DR
This paper empirically compares PCA and ICA algorithms on simulated noisy time series, highlighting ICA's superior performance due to its consideration of higher moments, while noting PCA's sensitivity to signal correlations.
Contribution
It provides an empirical analysis of PCA and ICA from a data distribution perspective, emphasizing differences in their robustness and effectiveness.
Findings
ICA outperforms PCA on noisy data
ICA considers higher moments of data distribution
PCA is sensitive to correlations among signals
Abstract
We performed an empirical comparison of ICA and PCA algorithms by applying them on two simulated noisy time series with varying distribution parameters and level of noise. In general, ICA shows better results than PCA because it takes into account higher moments of data distribution. On the other hand, PCA remains quite sensitive to the level of correlations among signals.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBlind Source Separation Techniques · Neural Networks and Applications · Image and Signal Denoising Methods
MethodsIndependent Component Analysis · Principal Components Analysis
