Parametrizations of three-body hadronic $B$- and $D$-decay amplitudes in terms of analytic and unitary meson-meson form factors
D. Boito, J.-P. Dedonder, B. El-Bennich, R. Escribano, R. Kaminski, L., Lesniak, and B. Loiseau

TL;DR
This paper presents a new method for parametrizing three-body hadronic $B$ and $D$ decay amplitudes using analytic and unitary meson-meson form factors, improving the interpretation of CP asymmetries over traditional models.
Contribution
It introduces a theoretically sound parametrization approach based on coupled-channel equations and form factors that respect fundamental quantum field theory properties, offering a better alternative to the isobar model.
Findings
Provides explicit amplitude expressions for various $B$ and $D$ decays.
Demonstrates phenomenological success of the approach in previous studies.
Offers a versatile parametrization method applicable to other three-body channels.
Abstract
We introduce parametrizations of hadronic three-body and weak decay amplitudes that can be readily implemented in experimental analyses and are a sound alternative to the simplistic and widely used sum of Breit-Wigner type amplitudes, also known as the isobar model. These parametrizations can be particularly useful in the interpretation of CP asymmetries in the Dalitz plots. They are derived from previous calculations based on a quasi-two-body factorization approach in which two-body hadronic final state interactions are fully taken into account in terms of unitary - and -wave , and form factors. These form factors can be determined rigorously, fulfilling fundamental properties of quantum field-theory amplitudes such as analyticity and unitarity, and are in agreement with the low-energy behaviour predicted by effective theories of QCD. They are…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
