Validating neural-network refinements of nuclear mass models
R. Utama, J. Piekarewicz

TL;DR
This paper validates neural-network refined nuclear mass models against recent experimental data, showing significant improvements and potential for advancing nuclear astrophysics research.
Contribution
It introduces a neural network-based refinement method for nuclear mass models and demonstrates its effectiveness with recent experimental data.
Findings
BNN predictions significantly outperform original models
Good agreement with recent AME2016 nuclear mass data
Root-mean-square deviation of about 400 keV for key isotopes
Abstract
Nuclear astrophysics centers on the role of nuclear physics in the cosmos. In particular, nuclear masses at the limits of stability are critical in the development of stellar structure and the origin of the elements. In this contribution we test and validate the predictions of recently refined nuclear mass models against the newly published AME2016 compilation. The basic paradigm underlining the recently refined nuclear mass models is based on existing state-of-the-art models that are subsequently refined through the training of an artificial neural network. We observe a significant improvement in the Bayesian Neural Network (BNN) predictions relative to the corresponding "bare" models when compared to the nearly 50 new masses reported in the AME2016 compilation. Further, AME2016 estimates for the handful of impactful isotopes in the determination of r-process abundances are found to be…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
