Review of image quality measures for solar imaging

TL;DR

This paper evaluates 36 image quality assessment methods for solar imaging, comparing their effectiveness under various atmospheric conditions using simulated data and real satellite references.

Contribution

It provides a comprehensive comparison of image quality metrics for solar observations, identifying the most effective methods for different seeing conditions.

Findings

Helmli and Scherer's Mean is computationally efficient and versatile.

Median Filter Gradient Similarity performs best under good seeing conditions.

Discrete Cosine Transform Energy Ratio is suitable for strongly blurred images.

Abstract

The observations of solar photosphere from the ground encounter significant problems due to the presence of Earth's turbulent atmosphere. Prior to applying image reconstruction techniques, the frames obtained in most favorable atmospheric conditions (so-called lucky frames) have to be carefully selected. However, the estimation of the quality of images containing complex photospheric structures is not a trivial task and the standard routines applied in night-time Lucky Imaging observations are not applicable. In this paper we evaluate 36 methods dedicated for the assessment of image quality which were presented in the rich literature over last 40 years. We compare their effectiveness on simulated solar observations of both active regions and granulation patches, using reference data obtained by the Solar Optical Telescope on the Hindoe satellite. To create the images affected by a known degree of atmospheric degradation, we employ the Random Wave Vector method which faithfully models all the seeing characteristics. The results provide useful information about the methods performance depending on the average seeing conditions expressed by the ratio of the telescope's aperture to the Fried parameter, $D/r_0$. The comparison identifies three methods for consideration by observers: Helmli and Scherer's Mean, Median Filter Gradient Similarity, and Discrete Cosine Transform Energy Ratio. While the first one requires less computational effort and can be used effectively virtually in any atmospherics conditions, the second one shows its superiority at good seeing ($D/r_0<4$). The last one should be considered mainly for the post-processing of strongly blurred images.