Identitas: A Better Way To Be Meaningless
Nizal Alshammry, Phillip Lord

TL;DR
This paper critiques the common practice of using monotonically increasing numeric identifiers for ontology terms, highlighting usability flaws and proposing alternative, more effective identifier schemes.
Contribution
It introduces a critique of current semantics-free identifiers and offers a flexible implementation of alternative identifier schemes for ontology development.
Findings
Monotonically increasing numeric identifiers have significant usability flaws.
Alternative identifier schemes can improve ontology usability.
The proposed implementation is freely available for use and combination.
Abstract
It is often recommended that identifiers for ontology terms should be semantics-free or meaningless. In practice, ontology developers tend to use numeric identifiers, starting at 1 and working upwards. In this paper we present a critique of current ontology semantics-free identifiers; monotonically increasing numbers have a number of significant usability flaws which make them unsuitable as a default option, and we present a series of alternatives. We have provide an implementation of these alternatives which can be freely combined.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCatholicism and Religious Studies · Medieval Philosophy and Theology
