All Classical Adversary Methods are Equivalent for Total Functions
Andris Ambainis, Martins Kokainis, Kri\v{s}j\=anis Pr\=usis,, Jevg\=enijs Vihrovs, Aleksejs Zajakins

TL;DR
None
Contribution
None
Abstract
We show that all known classical adversary lower bounds on randomized query complexity are equivalent for total functions, and are equal to the fractional block sensitivity . That includes the Kolmogorov complexity bound of Laplante and Magniez and the earlier relational adversary bound of Aaronson. This equivalence also implies that for total functions, the relational adversary is equivalent to a simpler lower bound, which we call rank-1 relational adversary. For partial functions, we show unbounded separations between and other adversary bounds, as well as between the adversary bounds themselves. We also show that, for partial functions, fractional block sensitivity cannot give lower bounds larger than , where is the number of variables and is the block sensitivity. Then we exhibit a partial function …
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
