Performance Limitations of Distributed Integral Control in Power Networks Under Noisy Measurements
Hendrik Flamme, Emma Tegling, Henrik Sandberg

TL;DR
This paper investigates the performance of the distributed averaging PI controller in power networks, revealing that measurement noise can significantly impact its effectiveness and scalability, especially in large, sparse networks.
Contribution
The study provides a detailed analysis of how noisy measurements affect the transient performance of DAPI controllers, highlighting conditions for optimal performance and when centralized control may be preferable.
Findings
Measurement noise can significantly degrade DAPI performance.
Increased inter-nodal alignment improves robustness to noise.
Large sparse networks may favor centralized control over distributed methods.
Abstract
Distributed approaches to secondary frequency control have become a way to address the need for more flexible control schemes in power networks with increasingly distributed generation. The distributed averaging proportional-integral (DAPI) controller presents one such approach. In this paper, we analyze the transient performance of this controller, and specifically address the question of its performance under noisy frequency measurements. Performance is analyzed in terms of an H2 norm metric that quantifies power losses incurred in the synchronization transient. While previous studies have shown that the DAPI controller performs well, in particular in sparse networks and compared to a centralized averaging PI (CAPI) controller, our results prove that additive measurement noise may have a significant negative impact on its performance and scalability. This impact is shown to decrease…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
