The Star-Planet Connection I: Using Stellar Composition to Observationally Constrain Planetary Mineralogy for the Ten Closest Stars
Natalie Hinkel, Cayman Unterborn

TL;DR
This study uses stellar compositions from the Hypatia Catalog to infer planetary mineralogy around the ten closest stars, highlighting the need for extremely precise abundance measurements to distinguish planetary types.
Contribution
It demonstrates how stellar abundance uncertainties impact the ability to determine planetary mineralogy and emphasizes the precision required for meaningful differentiation.
Findings
Mineralogies are similar across the 10 studied planets due to abundance degeneracy.
Abundance measurement precisions of <0.02 dex for Fe/H are necessary to distinguish planetary populations.
High-precision stellar abundances are crucial for accurately inferring planetary structures.
Abstract
The compositions of stars and planets are connected, yet, the definition of "habitability" and the "habitable zone" only take into account the physical relationship between the star and planet. Planets, however, are made truly habitable by both chemical and physical processes which regulate climatic and geochemical cycling between atmosphere, surface, and interior reservoirs. Despite this, "Earth-like" is often defined as a planet made of a mixture of rock and Fe that is roughly 1 Earth-density. To understand the interior of a terrestrial planet, the stellar abundances of planet-building elements (e.g. Mg, Si, and Fe) can be utilized as a proxy for the planet's composition. We explore the planetary mineralogy and structure for fictive planets around the 10 closest stars to the Sun using stellar abundances from the Hypatia Catalog. Despite our sample containing stars both sub- and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
