
TL;DR
This paper presents a theoretical analysis showing that actomyosin bundles can generate extension rather than contraction due to internal dynamical processes, challenging the traditional view of their contractile nature.
Contribution
It introduces a model demonstrating how actin treadmilling and myosin dynamics can control actomyosin mechanics, including reversals of movement and extension generation.
Findings
Actomyosin bundles can extend instead of contract.
Internal processes enable control over active mechanics.
Reversals of filament velocities are possible.
Abstract
Living cells move thanks to assemblies of actin filaments and myosin motors that range from very organized striated muscle tissue to disordered intracellular bundles. The mechanisms powering these disordered structures are debated, and all models studied so far predict that they are contractile. We reexamine this prediction through a theoretical treatment of the interplay of three well-characterized internal dynamical processes in actomyosin bundles: actin treadmilling, the attachement-detachment dynamics of myosin and that of crosslinking proteins. We show that these processes enable an extensive control of the bundle's active mechanics, including reversals of the filaments' apparent velocities and the possibility of generating extension instead of contraction. These effects offer a new perspective on well-studied in vivo systems, as well as a robust criterion to experimentally…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCellular Mechanics and Interactions · Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies · Hemoglobin structure and function
