Analogies between the crossing number and the tangle crossing number
Robin Anderson, Shuliang Bai, Fidel Barrera-Cruz, \'Eva, Czabarka, Giordano Da Lozzo, Natalie L. F. Hobson, Jephian C.-H. Lin, and Austin Mohr, Heather C. Smith, L\'aszl\'o A. Sz\'ekely, Hays, Whitlatch

TL;DR
This paper explores the properties of tangle crossing numbers in tanglegrams, establishing bounds, sharpness of edge removal effects, and providing an algorithm for lower bounds, with implications for phylogenetics.
Contribution
It introduces new bounds and algorithms for tangle crossing numbers, paralleling classical crossing number theorems, and analyzes their sharpness and computational aspects.
Findings
Removing one matching edge decreases the crossing number by at most n-3, and this bound is sharp.
Maximum tangle crossing number for n leaves is roughly half of the total pairs, asymptotically.
An O(n^4) algorithm computes lower bounds on the tangle crossing number, potentially tight.
Abstract
Tanglegrams are special graphs that consist of a pair of rooted binary trees with the same number of leaves, and a perfect matching between the two leaf-sets. These objects are of use in phylogenetics and are represented with straightline drawings where the leaves of the two plane binary trees are on two parallel lines and only the matching edges can cross. The tangle crossing number of a tanglegram is the minimum crossing number over all such drawings and is related to biologically relevant quantities, such as the number of times a parasite switched hosts. Our main results for tanglegrams which parallel known theorems for crossing numbers are as follows. The removal of a single matching edge in a tanglegram with leaves decreases the tangle crossing number by at most , and this is sharp. Additionally, if is the maximum tangle crossing number of a tanglegram with…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
