High-redshift AGN in the Chandra Deep Fields: the obscured fraction and space density of the sub-$L_*$ population
F. Vito, W.N. Brandt, G. Yang, R. Gilli, B. Luo, C. Vignali, Y.Q. Xue,, A. Comastri, A.M. Koekemoer, B.D. Lehmer, T. Liu, M. Paolillo, P. Ranalli,, D.P. Schneider, O. Shemmer, M. Volonteri, J. Wang

TL;DR
This study analyzes high-redshift AGN in deep X-ray surveys, revealing their obscured fraction, faint flux counts, and the evolution of their space density and luminosity function, especially for low-luminosity AGN.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed constraints on the low-luminosity AGN population at high redshift using the deepest X-ray data, including obscured sources.
Findings
Obscured AGN fraction is 60-80%, independent of redshift and luminosity.
Extended AGN number counts to fainter fluxes at z>4.
High-redshift AGN space density declines across all luminosities.
Abstract
We investigate the population of high-redshift () AGN selected in the two deepest X-ray surveys, the 7 Ms \textit{Chandra} Deep Field-South and 2 Ms \textit{Chandra} Deep Field-North. Their outstanding sensitivity and spectral characterization of faint sources allow us to focus on the sub- regime (log), poorly sampled by previous works using shallower data, and the obscured population. Taking fully into account the individual photometric-redshift probability distribution functions, the final sample consists of X-ray selected AGN at . The fraction of AGN obscured by column densities log is , once incompleteness effects are taken into account, with no strong dependence on redshift or luminosity. We derived the high-redshift AGN number counts down to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
