Statistical methods for estimating ecological breakpoints and prediction intervals
Jabed H Tomal, Jan JH Ciborowski

TL;DR
This paper compares statistical methods for identifying ecological breakpoints, highlighting the advantages of piecewise linear quantile regression in analyzing environmental data with natural variability.
Contribution
It introduces and evaluates the use of piecewise linear quantile regression for more precise ecological breakpoint estimation compared to traditional methods.
Findings
PQRM provides more accurate breakpoint estimates.
Significant ecological breakpoints identified in case studies.
PQRM captures variability better than PLRM.
Abstract
The relationships among ecological variables are usually obtained by fitting statistical models that go through the conditional means of the dependent variables. For example, the nonparametric loess and the parametric piecewise linear regression models, which pass through the conditional mean of the response variable given the predictor, are used to analyze simple to complex relationships among variables. We used loess and bootstrapped confidence interval to subjectively identify the number and positions of potential ecological breakpoints in a bivariate relationship, and a piecewise linear regression model (PLRM) to quantitatively estimate the location of breakpoints and the associated precision. We also estimated breakpoint location and precision using a piecewise linear quantile regression model (PQRM), which is fitted to the quantiles of the conditional distribution of the response…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSoil Geostatistics and Mapping · Data Analysis with R · Statistical and Computational Modeling
