A Shielding Property for Thermal Equilibrium States on the Quantum Ising Model
Nat\'alia S. M\'oller, Alberto L. de Paula Jr, Raphael C. Drumond

TL;DR
This paper proves a shielding property for Gibbs states in non-homogeneous quantum Ising chains, showing that zero-field sites decouple subchains, preserving their Gibbs states even under strong interactions, with implications for stability under perturbations.
Contribution
It introduces a novel shielding property for thermal states in quantum Ising models, demonstrating conditions under which subchains behave independently despite interactions.
Findings
Zero-field sites decouple subchains in Gibbs states.
The shielding property holds for single-site interfaces but not necessarily for multi-site interfaces.
Perturbations on one side do not affect the other side's equilibrium state or dynamics when shielding applies.
Abstract
We show that Gibbs states of non-homogeneous transverse Ising chains satisfy a \emph{shielding} property. Namely, whatever the fields on each spin and exchange couplings between neighboring spins are, if the field in one particular site is null, the reduced states of the subchains to the right and to the left of this site are \emph{exactly} the Gibbs states of each subchain alone. Therefore, even if there is a strong exchange coupling between the extremal sites of each subchain, the Gibbs states of the each subchain behave as if there is no interaction between them. In general, if a lattice can be divided into two disconnected regions separated by an interface of sites with zero applied field, we can guarantee a similar result only if the surface contains a single site. Already for an interface with two sites we show an example where the property does not hold. When it holds, however,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
