Using marginal structural models to adjust for treatment drop-in when developing clinical prediction models
Matthew Sperrin, Glen Martin, Tjeerd Van Staa, Niels Peek, Iain Buchan

TL;DR
This paper introduces a novel use of marginal structural models to adjust for treatment drop-in in clinical prediction models, improving risk estimation for treatment-naive scenarios in observational and trial data.
Contribution
The study demonstrates how MSMs can be effectively integrated into CPM development to correct for treatment drop-in bias, a novel approach in this context.
Findings
MSMs reduce underestimation of risk caused by treatment drop-in
Ignoring treatment drop-in leads to biased risk predictions
MSMs enable estimation of individual treatment effects
Abstract
Objectives: Clinical prediction models (CPMs) can inform decision-making concerning treatment initiation. Here, one requires predicted risks assuming that no treatment is given. This is challenging since CPMs are often derived in datasets where patients receive treatment; moreover, treatment can commence post-baseline - treatment drop-ins. This study presents a novel approach of using marginal structural models (MSMs) to adjust for treatment drop-in. Study Design and Setting: We illustrate the use of MSMs in the CPM framework through simulation studies, representing randomised controlled trials and observational data. The simulations include a binary treatment and a covariate, each recorded at two timepoints and having a prognostic effect on a binary outcome. The bias in predicted risk was examined in a model ignoring treatment, a model fitted on treatment na\"ive patients (at…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
