Fragile Topology and Wannier Obstructions
Hoi Chun Po, Haruki Watanabe, Ashvin Vishwanath

TL;DR
This paper introduces the concept of fragile topology in electronic bands, showing that some bands cannot be represented by Wannier functions unless additional trivial bands are included, challenging previous assumptions about band splitting and topology.
Contribution
It constructs a physical model demonstrating fragile topology on the honeycomb lattice and clarifies its distinction from stable topological phases, impacting band theory and material modeling.
Findings
Fragile topology allows Wannier representations only with additional trivial bands.
A constructed honeycomb lattice model exemplifies fragile topology.
Splitting elementary band representations does not necessarily produce topological bands.
Abstract
Topological phases, such as Chern insulators, are defined in terms of additive indices that are stable against the addition of trivial degrees of freedom. Such topology presents an obstruction to any Wannier representation, namely, the representation of the electronic states in terms of symmetric, exponentially localized Wannier functions. Here, we address the converse question: Do obstructions to Wannier representation imply stable band topology? We answer this in the negative, pointing out that some bands can also display a distinct type of "fragile topology." Bands with fragile topology do not admit any Wannier representation by themselves, but such a representation becomes possible once certain additional trivial degrees of freedom are supplied. We construct a physical model of fragile topology on the honeycomb lattice that also helps resolve a recent puzzle in band theory. This…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
