The geography of references in elite articles: What countries contribute to the archives of knowledge
Lutz Bornmann, Caroline Wagner, Loet Leydesdorff

TL;DR
This paper analyzes the geographic origins of references in top-1% highly cited articles from 2004-2013, revealing insights into which countries contribute foundational knowledge to elite research, with China emerging as a major player but still a low contributor.
Contribution
It introduces a backward-citing perspective to assess national contributions to elite research, focusing on referenced publications rather than citations received.
Findings
China is a major contributor but still low in references to top articles.
The USA exceeds expectations in contributing to references in elite publications.
Switzerland, Sweden, and the Netherlands rank highly in contributions.
Abstract
This study is intended to find an answer for the question on which national "shoulders" the worldwide top-level research stands. Traditionally, national scientific standings are evaluated in terms of the number of citations to their papers. We raise a different question: instead of analyzing the citations to the countries' articles (the forward view), we examine referenced publications from specific countries cited in the most elite publications (the backward-citing-view). "Elite publications" are operationalized as the top-1% most-highly cited articles. Using the articles published during the years 2004 to 2013, we examine the research referenced in these works. Our results confirm the well-known fact that China has emerged to become a major player in science. However, China still belongs to the low contributors when countries are ranked as contributors to the cited references in…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
