Rigid vs compliant contact: An experimental study on biped walking
Majid Khadiv, S. Ali A. Moosvian, Aghil Yousefi-Koma, Majid Sadedel,, Abbas Ehsani-Seresht, Saeed Mansouri

TL;DR
This paper compares rigid and compliant contact models for bipedal robot walking, experimentally validating their effectiveness in predicting robot dynamics on semi-rigid surfaces.
Contribution
It introduces a novel nonlinear compliant contact model and provides experimental validation comparing both models with real robot data.
Findings
Rigid contact model is simpler and suitable for control and optimization.
Compliant contact model offers more realistic simulation.
Both models effectively estimate the robot's dynamic behavior.
Abstract
Contact modeling plays a central role in motion planning, simulation, and control of legged robots, as legged locomotion is realized through contact. The two prevailing approaches to model the contact consider rigid and compliant premise at interaction ports. Contrary to the dynamics model of legged systems with rigid contact (without impact) which is straightforward to develop, there is no consensus among researchers to employ a standard compliant contact model. Our main goal in this paper is to study the dynamics model structure of bipedal walking systems with a rigid contact and a \textit{novel} compliant contact model and to present experimental validation of both models. For the model with rigid contact, after developing the model of the articulated bodies in flight phase without any contact with the environment, we apply the holonomic constraints at contact points and develop a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
