Dust attenuation in 2<z<3 star-forming galaxies from deep ALMA observations of the Hubble Ultra Deep Field
R. J. McLure, J.S. Dunlop, F. Cullen, N. Bourne, P.N. Best, S., Khochfar, R.A.A. Bowler, A.D. Biggs, J.E. Geach, D. Scott, M.J. Michalowski,, W. Rujopakarn, E. van Kampen, A. Kirkpatrick, A. Pope

TL;DR
This study uses deep ALMA observations to analyze dust attenuation in star-forming galaxies at redshifts 2 to 3, establishing empirical IRX-beta and IRX-mass relations consistent with a Calzetti-like attenuation law.
Contribution
It provides new empirical IRX-beta and IRX-mass relations for high-redshift galaxies, clarifying the dust attenuation law and addressing previous conflicting results.
Findings
Galaxies follow a grey attenuation law similar to Calzetti.
IRX-mass relation predicts UV attenuation more reliably than beta.
No strong evidence for SMC-like dust law at these redshifts.
Abstract
We present the results of a new study of the relationship between infrared excess (IRX), UV spectral slope (beta) and stellar mass at redshifts 2<z<3, based on a deep Atacama Large Millimeter Array (ALMA) 1.3-mm continuum mosaic of the Hubble Ultra Deep Field (HUDF). Excluding the most heavily-obscured sources, we use a stacking analysis to show that z~2.5 star-forming galaxies in the mass range 9.25 <= log(M/Msun) <= 10.75 are fully consistent with the IRX-beta relation expected for a relatively grey attenuation curve, similar to the commonly adopted Calzetti law. Based on a large, mass complete, sample of 2 <= z <= 3 star-forming galaxies drawn from multiple surveys, we proceed to derive a new empirical relationship between beta and stellar mass, making it possible to predict UV attenuation (A_1600) and IRX as a function of stellar mass, for any assumed attenuation law. Once again, we…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
