TL;DR
This paper investigates the inductive capabilities of latent factor models for relational learning in knowledge graphs through experimental surveys and synthetic tasks, revealing their strengths and weaknesses.
Contribution
It provides an empirical analysis of state-of-the-art models' inductive abilities and suggests new research directions for improvement.
Findings
Models excel at certain atomic relation properties
Identified weaknesses in inter-relational inference
Proposed new research directions for model enhancement
Abstract
Latent factor models are increasingly popular for modeling multi-relational knowledge graphs. By their vectorial nature, it is not only hard to interpret why this class of models works so well, but also to understand where they fail and how they might be improved. We conduct an experimental survey of state-of-the-art models, not towards a purely comparative end, but as a means to get insight about their inductive abilities. To assess the strengths and weaknesses of each model, we create simple tasks that exhibit first, atomic properties of binary relations, and then, common inter-relational inference through synthetic genealogies. Based on these experimental results, we propose new research directions to improve on existing models.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
